(Louis Meulstee's web site)


Back to the home page of Louis Meulstee's "Wireless for the Warrior" web-site

Various models Using the Fullerphone Superposing Unit

Fullerphone


For many years I have been intrigued by the Fullerphone. Over the last 20 years I have gathered a lot of information of its history, operation and practical use. On this extra web page I have compiled some basic historical and technical information on this relatively unknown, but very remarkable DC Morse telegraph set. I am convinced that you will enjoy reading these pages as much as I have when I arranged the compilation. Thanks are due to Mike Willenbroek for providing two Fullerphones from his collection which enabled me to take the colour photographs posted on this page.


Fullerphone Mk.V. This model is fitted in a wooden case ('Boxes, No. 2, Fullerphone, YA.6156') which has no provision for stowing the headphones in the lid. Headphones without a metal clip such as 'Receivers, headgear, C.L.R., double, No. 3' or 'Receivers, headgear, D.L.R., double, No. 5' (shown in photo) were normally used with this type of wooden case.


What is a Fullerphone and how does it work

The Fullerphone is a portable DC line Morse telegraph, devised in 1915 by Captain (later Maj.Gen) A.C. Fuller of the British Signal Service. The main feature of the Fullerphone is that the transmissions are practical immune from overhearing which made the system at the time very suitable for use in forward areas. In addition, the Fullerphone is very sensitive and a line current of only 0.5 microampere is sufficient for readable signals. In practice, however, 2 microamperes are required for comfortable readings and it can be worked over normal Army field lines 15-20 miles long. When superposed on existing telephone lines, telephone and Fullerphone signals may be sent over the line simultaneously without mutual interference.
It must be noted that Fullerphone signals are much clearer than those of a 'Buzzer telegraph' as the start and end of a signal do not depend on the starting and stopping of a vibrating armature, and hence, the possible speed is higher than that with the Buzzer telegraph.
The Fullerphone should not be compared with other DC telegraph systems and Buzzer telegraphs, since its operation principle differs considerably. The Fullerphone employ direct current in the line. By means of a chopping device and a filter circuit the current which flows in the headphones of both transmitting and receiving Fullerphones is interrupted at an audible frequency (about 400 to 550 Hz). That means that no call can be received (or side tone be heard) unless the chopping device (also known as Buzzer-Chopper) is working and properly adjusted. Therefore the Buzzer-Chopper must always running whether transmitting or receiving. Adjustment of the Buzzer-Chopper is not a difficult job, but requires some accuracy from the operator. (See 'Using the Fullerphone')


Simplified circuit Fullerphone

Simplified circuit diagram of the Fullerphone. When in operational use, the polarised Buzzer F is always running and comprises a driving contact 'B' and a chopping or interrupting contact 'K'.

Reception.
If a DC voltage is applied between the L1 and L2 terminals and the circuit is momentarily closed at contact K, a current will flow through the choke coils CH1 and CH2, the headphones, contact K and the Morse key. When the circuit is broken at K the current cannot flow through the headphones but will flow into and charge the condensers C1, C2 and C3. If the circuit is again closed at K the condensers partially discharge through the headphones. Therefore when the chopper is working, an intermittant current at audible frequency flows through the headphones while the line current alternately flows through the headphones and into the condensers. The line current remains practically constant. Thus Morse code dots and dashes sent by the single current Morse key at the distant Fullerphone are received as short and long notes in the headphones while the current in the line is of much the same nature as that sent by a single current Morse set. The line current in this case, however, is very much smaller, and clicks are not perceptible due to the smoothing action of the filters in the Fullerphone.

Transmitting.
When transmitting, the Buzzer-Chopper is kept working as on reception. If the circuit is closed at contact K and the Morse key is pressed, a current from the battery flows through contact K, the headphones, the chokes CH1 and CH2, and the line to the distant Fullerphone. At the same time, the condensers C1, C2 and C3 are charged to the voltage of the battery. When the circuit is broken at contact K, no current can flow from the battery or through the headphones. But the condensers are now able to discharge and send a current to the line in the same direction as the battery current. The combined action of the chokes and condensers thus maintains a steady flow of current to the line as long as the key is pressed in spite of the fact that the battery current is being continually interrupted at contact K. This arrangement enables the sending operator to hear his own signals in his headphones.

Potentiometer.
The potentiometer is used for balancing out certain forms of DC earth potentials which may be picked up by the Fullerphone line circuit, notably on those where the earth is used as return line. Such a DC potential results in a current flow which is heard at the same frequency as the signals, thereby confusing them. The potentiometer is energised by an independent 1.5 volt dry battery and connected through a reversing switch (see the circuit diagram) so that a voltage can be impressed in the line equal and opposite to the voltage which is causing the interference. As the currents picked up will not necessary be the same at each end of the line, each Fullerphone station must adjust its own potentiometer to suit the earth current received. In normal operation, the potentiometer is not required and the reversing switch left in the centre position.



Fullerphone circuit

Overhearing
A filter combination of chokes and condensers prevents any variation in the line current during a signal, and prevents any audible frequency currents produced either by induction from other lines or by a buzzer or telephone speech on the line from passing through the headphones. It also ensures that the rise and fall of line current is comparatively slow and thus prevents clicks being heard in the receiver of a telephone set superposed on the same line. Therefore, the Fullerphone cannot be overheard either by induction or earth leakage, and can only be tapped by a similar instrument directly connected to the line. It was found that with the use of very sensitive equipment (believed to be valve amplifiers) it is possible to overhear a Fullerphone when the listening earth is within 180ft of the Fullerphone earth.


Historical development

World War One.. two large armies were densely packed in their trenches, at places only a few hundred yards apart. Signal communication was principally by telephone and various buzzer telegraph instruments, connected via single line and earth return. The earth was thus alive with buzzer and telephone induction.
During mid-1915 the Germans were extraordinary well informed of Allied plans. Carefully planned raids were met by hostile fire exactly timed and directed. Relieving troops would be greeted, if not by shells, by shouts of welcome from the opposing trench.
On one occasion a Scottish battalion took over its new front to the strains of its regimental march played by a German cornet! Espionage was suspected but an interned British civilian brought back the information that induction of lines led to widespread overhearing of signals.
Hastily conducted experiments carried out within the Allied lines left no doubt about the cause of the leakage, and measures against eavesdropping were rapidly introduced by using metallic circuits (twisted pair of wires in stead of an earth return) within 3 miles from the front line.
The ultimate solution to this problem came toward the end of 1915 when Captain A.C. Fuller devised the Fullerphone. In October 1915 Fuller brought two prototypes to 5 Corps in Flanders. His invention was tested on a five mile loop of cable, part of which ran in the water-filled moat of Ypres, with a 10 Ohm leak to earth. The instruments worked well and were obvious the answer to the problem of overhearing which had brought the British Expeditionary Force signal system almost to a standstill.  Priestley, The Signal Service in the European War of 1914 to 1918 (France)

Maj Gen AC Fuller
The inventor of the Fullerphone, Maj. Gen. A.C.Fuller with the Princess Mary medal.

Used in two wars
Initial issues of Fullerphones were made up from converted field telephone sets. This type, however, appeared to be not the most successful. Towards the end of 1916, the Fullerphone was firmly established, and by 1918 most divisions had adopted Fullerphones for all their forward communication circuits. After the Armistice, more improvements and modifications of the instrument were carried out. The basic principle, however, was never changed. In 1939 a fully re-designed model, the Mk. IV, went into service. This can be considered as the most successful model, not only being more sensitive than its predecessors, it had also a simplified buzzer-chopper, and was easy to use as it carried no telephone set. Although the Fullerphone was devised as a non-overhearable signalling set for static warfare, it was again widely used during World War Two because of its capability to work simultaneously with a telephone over the same line and working through very long or leaky lines where telephone or telegraph traffic was impossible. In the South West Pacific, for example, the Australians made extensive use of the Fullerphone notably in New Guinea. During Word War Two cases arose where submarine cable circuits were available but the necessary terminal equipment was found to be totally destroyed or not immediately available. To ascertain to what extent Fullerphones could be used on submarine cables of various lengths, trials were carried out on the request of the War Department, by Cable and Wireless Ltd. The results exceeded all expectations, and ranges of up to 700 miles were obtained with faint but readable Morse signals at a maximum of 20 words per minute.

Fullerphones in the desert
Tobruk-1942... A row of Mk.IV Fullerphones in use at an Australian headquarters in the Western Desert.



ODE TO A FULLERPHONE
(By Sigmn R.MELLOR, published in 'Jimmy', the WW2 journal of the Royal Corps of Signals in the Middle East)

What is my greatest joy in life,
More precious even than my wife,
So comforting 'midst all this strife?
My Fullerphone.


How well I love your merry tricks;
Even when your buzzer sticks;
Delighting me with faint key clicks;
Oh Fullerphone.


How tunefully your buzzer throbs
As tenderly I turn those knobs.
Most fascinating of all jobs.
Oh Fullerphone.


Potentiometer, its true
I'm not sure what to do with you.
Yet even you add beauty to
My Fullerphone.


Oh how I pity those poor souls
Who daily work remote controls,
Attached to crazy wireless poles.
Oh Fullerphone.


They never hear the tuneful tones
Of perfect Morse within their 'phones:
Just atmospherics, shrieks and groans.
Oh Fullerphone.


But I must cease to write more verse.
Communication getting worse.
No wonder that I rave and curse
At Fullerphone.


Asthmatic buzzers, - crazy keys.
How can one live a life of ease,
With damful instruments like these
Foul Fullerphones!


The contents of this page has preveously been published in The Old Timers Bulletin , the official journal of the AWA.



Wireless for the Warrior
URL homepage: www.wftw.nl